LIVE PULSE
3.9 Anthropic CEO Amodei calls for slower AI development and shared safety rules — 11 src2.1 Agility Robotics unveils Digit 5 humanoid for warehouses and factories — 2 src1.9 Apple ships rebuilt Siri with Google Gemini, but not in the EU — 2 src1.7 Siri AI in macOS 27 Golden Gate: FAQ, Germany availability, privacy questions — 2 src1.3 Sam Altman says OpenAI will not go public in 2026, citing AI safety concerns — 5 src1.1 OpenAI contractors review real ChatGPT conversations to rate responses, report says — 2 src1.0 Anthropic data retention policy prompts firms to limit Claude use for sensitive work — 1 src1.0 arXiv paper proposes emotion regulation framework for empathetic speech dialogue in audio-language models — 1 src1.0 Paper Studies Graph Matching Relaxations for Supervised Graph Prediction — 1 src1.0 arXiv Paper Proposes Framework for Cognitive Attribution in Acquired Representations — 1 src3.9 Anthropic CEO Amodei calls for slower AI development and shared safety rules — 11 src2.1 Agility Robotics unveils Digit 5 humanoid for warehouses and factories — 2 src1.9 Apple ships rebuilt Siri with Google Gemini, but not in the EU — 2 src1.7 Siri AI in macOS 27 Golden Gate: FAQ, Germany availability, privacy questions — 2 src1.3 Sam Altman says OpenAI will not go public in 2026, citing AI safety concerns — 5 src1.1 OpenAI contractors review real ChatGPT conversations to rate responses, report says — 2 src1.0 Anthropic data retention policy prompts firms to limit Claude use for sensitive work — 1 src1.0 arXiv paper proposes emotion regulation framework for empathetic speech dialogue in audio-language models — 1 src1.0 Paper Studies Graph Matching Relaxations for Supervised Graph Prediction — 1 src1.0 arXiv Paper Proposes Framework for Cognitive Attribution in Acquired Representations — 1 src
HEATPULSEAI MAGAZINES
FLIP · FOLLOW · SAVE
Log inSign up

ai-risk-debate

topic1 events
papersYESTERDAY 14:36 UTC

Max Planck researchers say AI threat warnings are subjective, not empirically proven

Researchers at the Max Planck Institute for Security and Privacy argue that claims about existential danger from AI systems rest on subjective judgment rather than empirical evidence. The institute says it still takes such warnings seriously, but avoids treating them as settled fact. The position was reported by Golem.de as part of the ongoing debate over how much risk advanced AI poses.

ai-safety/research/risk/max-planck